Automation in recruiting: Where investments really pay off

When it comes to recruiting, most of the essential tasks are still performed manually, even though many of them could have been automated long ago (Stepstone 2023).

This seems almost absurd in times of budget constraints, skills shortages, and growing expectations among candidates. And yet, resumes are still sorted by hand, appointments are coordinated by email, and application documents are checked manually in more than three-quarters of all companies. Why is this the case? And more importantly, where does automation really pay off—and where doesn't it?

After all, automation in recruiting is not an end in itself. It brings efficiency, no question. But it also carries risks – for example, when it comes to cultural fit or personal contact. Those who digitize across the board lose out. Those who invest in a targeted manner win: time, quality, and ultimately better employees.

This article shows which parts of the recruiting process can be automated without losing quality – and where human judgment remains indispensable. Supported by current data and practical examples, we provide guidance for companies that want to invest smarter instead of just becoming faster.

‍

Efficiency is not an end in itself. But it's a damn good start.

When companies take a close look at their recruiting processes today, one thing stands out above all else: the enormous amount of manual work involved. As said before, many companies still sort resumes by hand, coordinate appointments by email, and review documents manually – step by step, day after day.

At the same time, candidates today expect something different. According to LinkedIn (2024), more than one in three applicants now expects to receive feedback within seven days – even in more complex selection processes. Those who fail to meet this expectation lose both speed and talent.

This is the tipping point at which efficiency is no longer an internal concern. It becomes an external competitive factor. And to ensure this, it becomes a strategic issue.

Because automation is a question of “how.” The tools are there. The use cases are there. What is often missing is the courage to prioritize: Which tasks take up time without increasing quality?

And at what point does too much automation jeopardize what recruiting is all about—personal, tailored contact?

Every modern recruiting team navigates between these two poles. And this is precisely where smartly invested technology separates itself from blind activism.

If you want to take a closer look at the tension between quality and efficiency in recruiting, you will find more in-depth thoughts in our previous insight: Quality or efficiency? Never compromise when recruiting!

‍

Recruiting is not an assembly line

Ironically, in recruiting, where speed is crucial for attracting top talent, many tasks are still performed manually. This costs time and damages your reputation in terms of employer branding.

Yet the potential for acceleration has long been on the table. Especially where tasks are repetitive, follow rules, or simply take up time. CV screening, interview planning, reminders—this is where automation shows its strength. And it does so without compromising quality. Many candidates even find automated updates more appreciative than radio silence (LinkedIn 2024).

Current studies also support the view that this area is particularly suitable: according to a survey of HR managers, around 44% see the greatest potential for AI in recruiting because the processes there are particularly structured and standardized (Human Resources Manager 2024). This is precisely what makes them automatable – and yet controllable.

Three areas where automation is particularly worthwhile:

Pre-selection: Algorithms sort by qualifications, not only by keywords. Faster, more objective, broader.
Communication & coordination: Chatbots answer standard questions. Automated messages keep candidates up to date.
Document management: Checking for completeness, structuring data, recognizing duplicates – reliably and scalably.

But recruiting is not an assembly line. If you automate everything, you lose what convinces people most: genuine attention and personal contact.

That's why you should also steer clear of automation if ...

… Cultural Fit is important. Machines cannot recognize nuances.
… negotiations are pending. Trust is built in conversation, not in a chat window.
... first impressions count – during onboarding, in personal conversations, when interjecting at the right moment.

Automation is not a substitute, but rather a relief – to ensure that recruiting remains what it should be: a well-thought-out decision, not mass processing.

‍

The more automated the process, the more valuable the contact

There is a point at which efficiency ceases to be an advantage. Namely, when personal contact becomes the exception. In recruiting, this is fatal – it's all about trust, culture, and perspectives.

Yes, technology can do a lot. It recognizes patterns, structures data, and reacts in milliseconds. But it cannot build real relationships. It does not see nervousness. It does not see hesitation before a decision is made.

It doesn't see body language. And that's exactly what makes the difference – especially in management positions or strongly value-oriented roles.

Of course, this is not an argument against automation. On the contrary. Automated processes are essential for ensuring that people remain accessible where they are needed: in conversations, in decision-making, in onboarding. Personal contact becomes more valuable because the process around it is digital and efficient.

The trick is to consciously create space for genuine encounters – especially in the age of automation.

‍

From tool hype to genuine relief

The market for HR tech is booming. New tools promise everything from automated applicant communication to AI-supported skill matching. But what makes sense? And what is just good marketing?

Anyone investing today faces a choice: between short-term promises of automation and genuine process relief. The difference is huge. A tool that cannot be integrated into existing processes or does not match the skill level of the team will gather dust in a digital drawer – expensive, inefficient, and unused.

What the recruiting stack really needs to deliver:

Scalability instead of gimmicks
Data interfaces & integration
Usability for HR teams

The data shows how big the gap is: According to Bullhorn, less than 20% of staffing agencies used automated processes at all in 2023 – but the most successful ones invested almost twice as much in automation and digital infrastructure (Bullhorn 2023). Accenture also comes to a clear conclusion: Only 16% of companies have consistently built their processes with AI support – but it is precisely these companies that achieve up to 2.5 times higher productivity and better results than their competitors (Accenture 2024).

Change remains an underestimated factor. Automation transforms not only tools, but also roles, routines, and responsibilities. Successful projects therefore need more than just a budget. They need clarity, communication, and a team that is on board.

Automation does not work by purchasing it. No. It works by applying it. And that is precisely what determines whether an investment will ease the burden or become an IT project with no effect.

‍

Conclusion

Automation in recruiting does not make sense everywhere. Those who digitize the right processes save time, reduce costs, and increase quality. Those who focus on tool hype instead of structure lose energy—and, in the process, talent.

The best results are therefore achieved where technology supports rather than replaces. Where people are relieved of tasks so they can make more human decisions. Because recruiting doesn't get better just because it gets faster. It gets better when people have time again for (the important) decisions.

‍

Would you like to find out where automation can really take the strain off your recruiting processes without compromising on quality? CareerTeam supports you with strategic expertise, tried-and-tested technologies, and a clear focus on human interaction in the digital process. Together, we are reshaping recruiting: faster, more accurate, and people-centric. Get in touch – we look forward to hearing from you.

‍